Fat Bert said:
so why does it seem that [overall] a lot of BIRD riders progress from a lighter [argueably more flickable/handleable] bike like the VFR............
then opt back for a lighter bike with less power and performance?
Here again I fit into this section..
Had two CBR 600's then went to a Bird, now going back to something lighter, a Blade.
Its probably that having had and handled a lighter bike, the Bird although fast as fook and comfortable cant do everything. I do miss the adrenalin rush when the back end lifts and skips under braking with lighter bikes, it gives you a sense of, well, limits!.
The Bird is so easy to ride, but its a big heavy bugger, and like my mate Rich say's, is like the Star Ship Enterprise, extremley fast, but a big heavy bastid that cant corner.
To be honset, where are you going to do 180mph?, whereas the Blade tops out in the 170's, where are you going to use that also?. For the time that you can (on motorways) the difference is nothing. And for those of you who start quoting 0-60 times, most Bird riders I've met could do with losing half a dozen stone to ever be able to get anywhere near that time. You dont see big fat lardy arsed Blade riders, do you?, no because weight is everything. (Theres no fat GP fookers is there?)
Gauntlet thrown down, who's gonna pick it up?.
Buzz