As indeed can a battery.Nor can only be used with a negative, or can be used with either positive or negative.
Just need to make sure you get them round the right way though.
As indeed can a battery.Nor can only be used with a negative, or can be used with either positive or negative.
Nor can only be used with a negative, or can be used with either positive or negative.
You need to make your mind up what 'nor' can be used with.Nor can only be used with a negative, or can be used with either positive or negative.
So you are disputing it.I don't dispute that, my point is that you can't pair "or" with "neither" as you did.
It's "neither" with "nor" - or "either" with "or".
Well I had some nor chicken soup the other day and I'm positive it were lovely.
Then don’t try correcting me when I’m right.It's like trying to mud wrestle a pig.
Then don’t try correcting me when I’m right.
How am I wrong?You're not only wrong.... you're also Son of Beaker.
In his dreams ......You're not only wrong.... you're also Son of Beaker.
Nightmares.In his dreams ......
How am I wrong?
3
Both "nor" and "or" is grammatical here. Both are standard usage. There are other threads on this site that are related to your question. – F.E. Jun 10 '14 at 0:47
"Ergo"Taken straight from your final link (above)....
So, is "neither…or" all right to use? No, not in modern usage.
People who have the leisure and inclination to argue about such things are free to do so. Those who just want to write inoffensive standard English are advised to go with the conventional rule that either is used with or and neither is used with nor.
Ergo: you have shot yerself in the foot and I win by default. :campeon: