We’ve been second best all night & Leicester were unlucky to have their second goal ruled out, thank f+ck for crap referees.
I still don’t want var, it all depends on the var ref on the day, the game is held up for several minutes & they still come up with the wrong decision.And if you don’t take your chances you get punished - from the highlights I saw Leicester should have been at least 10-0 up.
shocker of a call by the assistant. Yet many still moan about VAR
You would have been two down with it last night - that is what VAR is great at, objective decision called incorrectly.I still don’t want var, it all depends on the var ref on the day, the game is held up for several minutes & they still come up with the wrong decision.
Had it been the other end it would have been ruled out with varYou would have been two down with it last night - that is what VAR is great at, objective decision called incorrectly.
I’ve just had another look and don’t think your mate is right but it did make me think.Referring to Leicester’s disallowed goal, just been discussing it with a mate who is a local league ref, he says the assistant got it right, if Rutter had deliberately chested the ball then the goal would have stood but as it hit him accidentally then it was offsiide, chuffing hell, the offside rule used to be so simple.
I don’t think there is confusion…it always goes back to the same thing….armchair experts not knowing the Laws!Be interesting tofind out, just shows the confusion in the game now.
Of course there is confusion, professional referees are getting it wrong more & more because they fail to understand the laws either that or they are showing bias which we know referees never doI don’t think there is confusion…it always goes back to the same thing….armchair experts not knowing the Laws!
PS I am very confident in the previous post I made!!
The ref is one person, armchair fans are millions, majority rules.Could it possibly be that the armchair experts who claim to be correct are actually wrong and the ref is right ?
That depends on the officialsIt all seems very simple to me. If Leeds score it is not offside. If the opposition score it is.
It doesn't seem to matter what the officials think. If Leeds score it is never offside. Thats my understanding of the offside rule which I have to admit I've only gleaned from this site.That depends on the officials
Yes, true, but whenever a ref makes a decision it doesn't then get him mobbed by all the players that have been decided against - they accept it and move on.If it’s a genuine offside then I can accept that but when a perfectly good goal is ruled out gecause the striker’s hand is offside then I’ll not accept that.
It isn’t just Football where the ref’s are crap but I’ve heard fans of egg chasing moan about various decisions made by ref’s
Was that before or after the French player got dismissed for a shocking tackle that could have killed his opponent??Dan Cole got told in no uncertain terms by the referee that if he appealed for a penalty again then that penalty would immediately be reversed. He didn't do it again. Proper refereeing.