Sorry, they call them town houses now I believe.Wait till Beaker reads ‘terraced’.
Sorry, they call them town houses now I believe.Wait till Beaker reads ‘terraced’.
Brownfield is an interesting subject. I have an involvement down here in an ex-briwnfield site that now has 14 nice (not extravagant) houses on it. Previously a run down eyesore of a car sales and service place for as long as anyone can remember. The upshot is that the adjoining green belt land (which is a nature reserve running from the sea about a mile inland) is less spoiled visually than it was when the garage was there. The local residents provided almost unanimous support for the scheme, everyone has ended up better off.I think the green belt thing is ass about face. Any brown sites in built up areas should be converted into parks or fields or trees but something green anyway and NOT built on. Allowing town or city boundaries to spread is not a problem providing space is allowed for green bits in-between. I mean between the new builds and not as present rules. The vast bulk of the UK is NOT built on. Fly over the UK at night and we have vast swathes with barely a light. Knock chunks of the big cities down and plant green rather than building new. Make new towns like Milton Keynes.
We call them 'hovels' down hereSorry, they call them town houses now I believe.
Everywhere is a hovel down there.We call them 'hovels' down here
Typically under educated response.Everywhere is a hovel down there.
I am neither typical or under educatedTypically under educated response.
Is that a euphemism?Your back lawn could do with a cut I’ve noticed this week Beaker....
Is that a euphemism?
I am neither typical or under educated
Either is acceptable, if you knew the English language you would have known that."I am neither typical nor under educated", you mean.
Either or.‘Would’ or ‘should’?
I think the green belt thing is ass about face. Any brown sites in built up areas should be converted into parks or fields or trees but something green anyway and NOT built on. Allowing town or city boundaries to spread is not a problem providing space is allowed for green bits in-between. I mean between the new builds and not as present rules. The vast bulk of the UK is NOT built on. Fly over the UK at night and we have vast swathes with barely a light. Knock chunks of the big cities down and plant green rather than building new. Make new towns like Milton Keynes.
Either is acceptable, if you knew the English language you would have known that.
Centaur mode on...
Centaur is the site pedant.
Centaur mode off...
Just saying.
Nor can only be used with a negative, or can be used with either positive or negative.AB mode on.
"nor" indicates a secondary negative, whereas "or" indicates an alternative.
Your sentence stated "I am neither typical or under educated". Starting your sentence with "neither" indicates that there should be a secondary negative condition. i.e. that you are NEITHER "typical" NOR are you "under educated".
Your use of "or" contradicts this. You should use EITHER with OR if you are indicating an alternative. i.e. you are EITHER "typical" OR you are "under educated".
Seemples.
AB mode off.